Air Canada Called Its Chatbot a Separate Legal Entity, Then Lost in Tribunal
Air Canada's chatbot invented a bereavement-refund policy, the airline argued in tribunal that the bot was a separate legal entity responsible for its own words, and Moffatt v. Air Canada made the airline pay anyway.
"It does not explain why it believes that is the case."
Ars Technica
Air Canada’s website chatbot told a grieving customer he could claim a bereavement discount after booking, a refund the airline did not actually offer, so he paid full fare and then got stiffed. Hauled before British Columbia’s Civil Resolution Tribunal, Air Canada tried the boldest defense in customer-service history, arguing the chatbot was a separate legal entity responsible for its own statements. Tribunal member Christopher Rivers was unmoved, ruled the airline liable for what its own bot promised, and ordered it to pay. A company wants the productivity of a robot employee and none of the responsibility for what the robot tells its customers. Read Ars Technica on the ruling.
Source: Ars Technica
More from Legal
Anthropic Pirated 500,000 Books and Settled for $3,000 Apiece
Anthropic settled the authors' piracy case for $1.5 billion, about $3,000 a book, the largest copyright payout on record.
ChatGPT Invented Six Court Cases for a Federal Brief, and Two Lawyers Got Sanctioned
A Manhattan lawyer used ChatGPT to research a brief against Avianca, it fabricated six judicial decisions with fake quotes and docket numbers, and Judge P. Kevin Castel fined the lawyers and their firm $5,000.